1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,423 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2004 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 1300 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3423 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 64 L |