1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 774 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | 1300 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1404 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |