1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (283 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1810 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth 1300 | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Abarth | Land Rover |
| Model | 1300 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 283 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 100 L |
