1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 2061 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1300 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 117 L |