1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Dodge Caravan
To start off, 2006 Dodge Caravan is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Caravan (151 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Caravan should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Because 1965 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Dodge Caravan | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | 1300 | Caravan |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 76 L |