1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 288 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Abarth | Dodge |
| Model | 1300 | Charger |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 6063 cc |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 425 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 72 L |
