1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Abarth 1300 (137 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Kangoo weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Because 1965 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 1300 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 50 L |