1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Bentley Arnage
To start off, 2009 Bentley Arnage is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 6,760 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Bentley Arnage (493 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 356 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Bentley Arnage | |
| Make | Abarth | Bentley |
| Model | 1300 | Arnage |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 6760 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 493 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2130 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3120 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 90 L |
