1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 405 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1300 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 6162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |