1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Abarth | Citroen |
Model | 1300 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |