1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S40 (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Because 1965 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Abarth | Volvo |
| Model | 1300 | S40 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 166 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1460 mm |
