1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 BMW X6
To start off, 2010 BMW X6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 BMW X6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW X6 (304 HP @ 440 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X6 weights approximately 1555 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 BMW X6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth 1300 | 2010 BMW X6 | |
| Make | Abarth | BMW |
| Model | 1300 | X6 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 304 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 440 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1983 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2933 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 85 L |
