1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1330 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | 1300 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 83 L |