1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (387 HP) has 250 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 1300 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 387 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4967 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1868 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1433 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2838 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |
