1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (148 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Because 2010 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | 1300 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 65 L |