1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2012 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Cube. (122 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Cube. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Cube weights approximately 635 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Because 1965 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2012 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | 1300 | Cube |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 50 L |