1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (365 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 1299 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | 1300 | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 365 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 72 L |