1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 2 weights approximately 413 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Because 1965 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth 1300 | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Abarth | Mazda |
| Model | 1300 | 2 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1694 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1476 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2489 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 43 L |
