1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-09 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 1432 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Mazda CX-09 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1300 | CX-09 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 76 L |