1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (306 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1676 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth 1300 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | 1300 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 306 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2306 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 100 L |
