1965 Abarth 595 vs. 2003 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 595. (27 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 856 kg more than 1965 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Abarth 595 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth 595. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth 595. (45 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth 595.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 595 | 2003 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 595 | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 594 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2650 mm |