1965 Abarth 595 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 595. (27 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 595.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth 595. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth 595. (45 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth 595.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 595 | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 595 | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 594 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 351 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 69 L |