1965 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1976 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1976 Opel Ascona is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Opel Ascona weights approximately 390 kg more than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1976 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Abarth | Opel |
Model | Mono 1000 | Ascona |
Year Released | 1965 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2530 mm |