1965 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1996 Buick Century
To start off, 1996 Buick Century is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Buick Century (119 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Buick Century should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 1965 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Buick Century (180 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm). This means 1996 Buick Century will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1996 Buick Century | |
Make | Abarth | Buick |
Model | Mono 1000 | Century |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1374 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2664 mm |