1965 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2002 Holden HSV
To start off, 2002 Holden HSV is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 602 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2002 Holden HSV | |
| Make | Abarth | Holden |
| Model | Mono 1000 | HSV |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 5698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 692 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
