1965 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo

To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Kangoo (64 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000.

Because 1965 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Kangoo (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Kangoo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Abarth Mono 1000 2003 Renault Kangoo
Make Abarth Renault
Model Mono 1000 Kangoo
Year Released 1965 2003
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 982 cc 1783 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 59 HP 64 HP
Engine RPM 6600 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 90 Nm 118 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 2250 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 21.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 3490 mm 4060 mm
Vehicle Width 1420 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1850 mm
Wheelbase Size 2010 mm 2630 mm