1965 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2004 Bristol Blenheim
To start off, 2004 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 835 kg more than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2004 Bristol Blenheim | |
Make | Abarth | Bristol |
Model | Mono 1000 | Blenheim |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 105 L |