1965 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | Mono 1000 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 78 L |