1965 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 298 more horse power than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 440 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Abarth | Holden |
Model | Mono 1000 | UTE |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |