1965 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 219 more horse power than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Abarth | Holden |
| Model | Mono 1000 | Caprice |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
