1965 Abarth OT vs. 1947 Austin A 40
To start off, 1965 Abarth OT is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Abarth OT (60 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 40. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin A 40 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 1947 Austin A 40 | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin |
| Model | OT | A 40 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1947 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 39 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 65.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 89 mm |
| Top Speed | 160 km/hour | 114 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 48 L |
