1965 Abarth OT vs. 1960 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1965 Abarth OT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac Brougham (210 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1615 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 1960 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | OT | Brougham |
Year Released | 1965 | 1960 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 210 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 98.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 2295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 75 L |