1965 Abarth OT vs. 1963 Abarth Mono 1000
To start off, 1965 Abarth OT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. Both 1965 Abarth OT and 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 are equipped with a 981 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Abarth OT (64 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Abarth OT weights approximately 120 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | |
Make | Abarth | Abarth |
Model | OT | Mono 1000 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 981 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 59 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 59 L |