1965 Abarth OT vs. 1963 Fiat Grand Break
To start off, 1965 Abarth OT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Fiat Grand Break is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Fiat Grand Break (96 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Fiat Grand Break should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Fiat Grand Break weights approximately 590 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 1963 Fiat Grand Break | |
Make | Abarth | Fiat |
Model | OT | Grand Break |
Year Released | 1965 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 96 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 37 L |