1965 Abarth OT vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1965 Abarth OT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lotus Elan (100 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Abarth OT weights approximately 90 kg more than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Abarth | Lotus |
| Model | OT | Elan |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 45 L |
