1965 Abarth OT vs. 1967 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1967 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Abarth OT (60 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1967 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1967 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT.
Because 1967 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth OT. (81 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1967 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth OT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 1967 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Abarth | Jeep |
| Model | OT | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2060 mm |
