1965 Abarth OT vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1976 Toyota Celica is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Toyota Celica (118 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Toyota Celica weights approximately 436 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | OT | Celica |
Year Released | 1965 | 1976 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 118 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 88.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 58 L |