1965 Abarth OT vs. 1980 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1980 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1230 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT.
Because 1965 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1965 Abarth OT has manual transmission. 1965 Abarth OT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 1980 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | OT | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 6030 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3090 mm |
