1965 Abarth OT vs. 1991 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro (140 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 720 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 1991 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | OT | Camaro |
Year Released | 1965 | 1991 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 140 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |