1965 Abarth OT vs. 1995 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1995 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 400 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 1995 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Abarth | Nissan |
| Model | OT | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 108 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2440 mm |
