1965 Abarth OT vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger (242 HP) has 178 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 1270 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Abarth | Mitsubishi |
| Model | OT | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 242 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2730 mm |
