1965 Abarth OT vs. 1996 Tata E220
To start off, 1996 Tata E220 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Tata E220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Tata E220 (148 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Tata E220 should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Tata E220 weights approximately 645 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Tata E220 (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth OT. (81 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1996 Tata E220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth OT.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 1996 Tata E220 | |
Make | Abarth | Tata |
Model | OT | E220 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2810 mm |