1965 Abarth OT vs. 1998 Dodge Neon
To start off, 1998 Dodge Neon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Dodge Neon (150 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Dodge Neon weights approximately 444 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 1998 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | Abarth | Dodge |
| Model | OT | Neon |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 150 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1124 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2750 mm |
