1965 Abarth OT vs. 1999 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1999 Mazda Midge is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda Midge weights approximately 286 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 1999 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Abarth | Mazda |
| Model | OT | Midge |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1400 mm |
