1965 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP) has 406 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 1075 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 762 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth OT. (81 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth OT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
| Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
| Model | OT | XKA |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 4399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 466 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 843 Nm |
| Top Speed | 160 km/hour | 299 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2590 mm |
