1965 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Peugeot 206
To start off, 2000 Peugeot 206 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,122 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Peugeot 206 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Abarth OT (64 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2000 Peugeot 206. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2000 Peugeot 206. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Peugeot 206 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT.
Because 1965 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 206, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 2000 Peugeot 206 | |
Make | Abarth | Peugeot |
Model | OT | 206 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1122 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 59 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 50 L |