1965 Abarth OT vs. 2001 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2001 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Abarth OT (60 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 310 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT.
Because 1965 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Seat Inca Kombi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth OT. (81 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2001 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth OT.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 2001 Seat Inca Kombi | |
Make | Abarth | Seat |
Model | OT | Inca Kombi |
Year Released | 1965 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 1391 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 107 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1035 kg |