1965 Abarth OT vs. 2001 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2001 Smart ForTwo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 981 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Smart ForTwo (74 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 140 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth OT | 2001 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | OT | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1965 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 74 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 33 L |