1965 Abarth OT vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 982 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 15 kg more than 1965 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Abarth OT. (81 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2002 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Abarth OT.

Compare all specifications: