1965 Abarth OT vs. 2003 Caterham 7
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1965 Abarth OT. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Abarth OT weights approximately 180 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth OT | 2003 Caterham 7 | |
| Make | Abarth | Caterham |
| Model | OT | 7 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 89.3 mm |
| Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 209 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2230 mm |
